# [线性代数] 矩阵代数進階：矩阵分解 Matrix factorization

**Matrix factorization **

导语：承载上集的矩阵代数入门，今天来聊聊进阶版，矩阵分解。其他集数可在[线性代数]标籤文章找到。有空再弄目录什麽的。

Matrix factorization is quite like an application of invertible matrices, where L is an invertible matrix in LU factorization.

As you may have seen, that solving Ax=b for x can be tedious with all the row-reduction algorithm. Here, we are going to explore another efficient algorithm for find x in matrix equation, which is LU Factorization. Suppose we are given L and U in the following form which reconstruct A. L is an invertible unit lower triangular mxm matrix, while U is the mxn echelon form of A. Recall a way to solve for x is by x=A^{-1}b and A^{-1} need to be invertible. Since L is invertible, LU is also invertible as proved in previous article in this series. The motivation here is that if we are to compute x for different b, we need to compute A^{-1}b_{i} for every single b. That"s not desirable and we should look for ways to circumvent this…

Suppose LU are already given, expressing A=LU is just the first step in LU factorization. Remember our goal of using matrix factorization is to solve for x in matrix equation. So we rely on the following:

Above suggests by row-reducing the following, we can get x. So we introduce y as the intermediate results along our way to get b. Noted that we still need to calculate each b individually for Ax=b, just that with the assistance of LU, less steps are involved.

As we know L as an lower unit triangular matrix, columns must be linearly independent. Since it"s mxm, L is also invertible. This means the following:

Indeed, when you get a lower triangular unit matrix L, it"s trivial to get I_{mxm} from it. As U is the echelon form of A and is of size mxn, so identity matrix is not guaranteed as the reduced echelon form may not be of square matrix.

**The LU factorization algorithm **

The prerequisite for using this algorithm is that, given any matrix A in Ax=b, A must be reduceable to echelon form, U, using row replacements of rows in a TOP-DOWN manner. However, this is always a hard requirement to meet and people sometimes relax this restriction into allowing row interchanges before performing top-down sequential row replacement in A. If the requirements are satisfied, it"s guaranteed we can get the lower triangular unit matrix L, and the proof of which is shown below:

And if we apply the same sequence of elementary matrices onto L, we restore the identity matrix I as follows:

But now it sounds a bit abstract. What exactly does give us btw? And how is it utilized to find L? The following example shows how. During the row-reduction of A into U, entries below pivot position in each pivot column is zeroed-out. The reverse of elementary row operations just require us to gather all pivot columns before their transformation and pack them into a nxn matrix.

When all pivot columns before row replacement gathered, L is easily available.

**Examples **

例子不定期更新